College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Our View

Put Student Safety First; Reconsider Hurricane Policy

By

|

Published: Monday, November 16, 2009

Updated: Monday, November 16, 2009

USA is known for its unwavering dedication to its academic calendar, but with Tropical Storm Ida’s arrival Nov. 10, USA took that dedication too far, putting its calendar ahead of student safety.

On Nov. 8,USA Director of Public Relations Keith Ayers sent out an e-mail acknowledging the expected “impact on the Mobile area is gusting winds and heavy rain, as well as flooding in tidal areas, beginning late Monday and early Tuesday.”

Those warnings alone should be enough for USA to cancel class for one day, but the calendar-god won out.

On Nov. 9, when reports of Ida making landfall early the next morning had local news broadcasts and Web sites buzzing with reports, USA and Spring Hill College were the only schools in the area that hadn’t announced a cancellation of classes for the next day. Bishop State Community College, Faulkner State Community College, and The University of Mobile all closed. Even some schools as far north as those in Washington County closed.

That evening, the Press-Register posted an online report listing the local institutions that had closed because of Ida. Mobile and Baldwin County schools would be closed that Tuesday. Numerous local organizations and businesses cancelled their meetings and events as they waited for Ida to hit the next day.

That evening, when Ida approached the Gulf Coast bringing heavy rain and wind, USA’s commuter students drove home in bleak weather, some of them realizing they would have to face the same conditions the next day while en route to USA.

Early on Nov. 10, with still no sign that the administration was letting up on its refusal to cancel classes and Ida still spewing nasty weather, commuter students drove back to USA to attend class, knowing they’d be counted absent if they weren’t present.

In an interview with The Vanguard, Ayers held that individual professors are allowed to cancel class if they feel weather conditions will be too hazardous for their students.

“It comes down to having faith in the faculty and in students to make the right decision for themselves,” he said.

It’s unfair for the administration to force students “to make the right decision” and choose between the risks of traveling in stormy weather or be counted absent when absences, in many professors’ classes, hurt students’ grades.

That “faith” Ayers spoke of is a cop-out for the administration to hide behind while it shakes off making an executive decision that’s not in favor of the academic calendar, which the administration idolizes.

It’s not the administration’s job to “have faith” in the student body; in the face of natural disaster, its job is to ensure student safety.

Not canceling classes and leaving it up to individual professors to hold classes doesn’t make sense. If professors deem the weather too dangerous to travel in, then so should the administration.

If one professor cancels class, others may not, which could make a student travel to USA for a mere one or two classes despite risky driving conditions.

Associate Director of Public Relations Scott Cox told The Vanguard that USA’s academic calendar allowed for Nov. 10 classes to be cancelled without professors having to make it up.

Thanks to the administration’s decision not to cancel classes, USA students whose children attend school during the week were seen toting their children from class to class on Tuesday, since local public schools heeded the National Weather Service’s hurricane watch and closed.

It appears that USA’s administration does not take these students’ concerns into account when deciding whether to cancel class for a natural disaster in an area that’s prone to hurricanes and tropical storms.

Unlike last year during Hurricane Gustav, the administration didn’t accommodate the student body. We hope that in the future, it will consider the welfare of the people of USA instead of deferring to a calendar.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments Log in to Comment

henry myers
Fri Nov 20 2009 16:49
My comment doesnt have anything to do with this but im a VAMPIRE as well, how can i reach this lady that came to the school? i need help on this ASAP.
Michelle Sommers
Thu Nov 19 2009 06:38
All of you missed the point. This article is obviously a satire on the entitlement culture of today's youth. Did you all really believe that someone would actually be upset about the college being in session during the light shower, Ida? You guys need to be less gullible, i mean, really. Come on, take a step back; No one could seriously think that the descision to remain at the status quo was bad.
Jacob O'Flannigan
Wed Nov 18 2009 10:16
I was hoping to get a response from the Vangaurd staff regarding the seriousness of this article. No real reason is given why the editors' general concern for student safety should outweigh the deliberate and methodical decision making process the administration used in the decision to not cancel class. Given that there was virtually no rain or wind Tuesday morning it seems that President Moulton made the right decision and that other entities, such as Mobile County schools made the wrong one. There was no extrordinary danger for students travelling to or from school, so why are the editors complaining? Its like this article written by children who are mad that their parents wouldn't let them stay home from school just because it was raining outside.
Khaela Huey
Tue Nov 17 2009 16:35
Ha ha... I feel stupid. It was Hurricane Gustav...
Khaela Huey
Tue Nov 17 2009 16:34
I can see both sides of this argument. Kayla, I understand that you were inconvenienced when your children were out of school and you weren't. Having to take young children to college with you is a hassle, especially since you have to keep them quiet and fed and entertained. Jacob, I can also see your point. Ida was nothing more than a tropical storm--similar to the storm last year that "ruined" everyone's Labor Day weekend (the name of it escapes me at the moment). And yes, most people are upset because they didn't get a day off like everyone else. But I'm confident that the University would not let anything terrible happen to their students. Plus students can make their own call about how safe it is to go to school, especially if a day off is really that important to them.
Jacob O'Flannigan
Tue Nov 17 2009 14:18
There are tens of thousands of other parents in Mobile County that have children in schools here that had to find some way to make it work when MCPSS shut down for the day. I didn't bring my kids to work with me on Tuesday. In fact, out of the 700 plus people that work where I do, no one had their kids at the office.

So what you're mad about Kayla is that the Mobile County Public Schools shutdown for the day and not USA. There was no safety concern for USA and therefore no reason to shutdown; MCPSS obviously had a different opinion. The vast majorit of students there ARE traditional, and most of the non-traditional students do not take day classes. The university made the decision that they shouldn't inconvenience thousands of other students, faculty, and staff just for a handful of students who have children in school. I don't expect my employer to give me free paid vacation everytime something inconvenient comes up, why would you?

Jacob O'Flannigan
Tue Nov 17 2009 13:58
There are tens of thousands of other parents in Mobile County that have children in schools here that had to find some way to make it work when MCPSS shut down for the day. I didn't bring my kids to work with me on Tuesday. In fact, out of the 700 plus people that work where I do, no one had their kids at the office.

So what you're mad about Kayla is that the Mobile County Public Schools shutdown for the day and not USA. There was no safety concern for USA and therefore no reason to shutdown; MCPSS obviously had a different opinion. The vast majorit of students there ARE traditional, and most of the non-traditional students do not take day classes. The university made the decision that they shouldn't inconvenience thousands of other students, faculty, and staff just for a handful of students who have children in school. I don't expect my employer to give me free paid vacation everytime something inconvenient comes up, why would you?

Kayla Bouttioux
Tue Nov 17 2009 13:16
No I'm angry because it was a huge inconvenience. I was one of the parents who had to figure out what to do with my kids. My husband was on emergency call which is normal proceedure during even small storms, and my parents work. Our babysitterhad her own classes to go to. So what was I left with? Two kids out of class and daycare and no where to put them. So I ended up having to either miss class or drag them with me. I attempted my morning class with them, but it was a disaster so I ended up having to go home with them and miss class. Thankfully my professors understood, and were irritated on my behalf. If the other school systems had shut down, USA should have had the sense to follow suit. You see USA has a lot of non traditional students. In other words, a lot of parents, who were inconvenienced by the school's refusal to close. And yes schools have closed for severe thunderstorms, but it has to be VERY bad weather. THey don't want to put students and faculty at risk.
Jacob O'Flannigan
Tue Nov 17 2009 11:59
Are you guys serious?
Ida was a non-event when it came through. I walked to work that Tuesday morning at 8:00 and there was barely a sprinkle. There may have been a stiff breeze, but nothing that would make me fear for my safety. I would say Ida was no worse than a strong thunderstorm that we see on a regular basis here in Mobile. Should the school be shutdown every time we have a thunderstorm? It seems like the administration made the right call on this one.

The administration has a system in place where they take input from experts and professionals (I'm guessing no journalism majors), weigh the pros and cons, and then make a decision. It sounds pretty solid to me. Are you all just mad that you didn't get the day off?

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In