College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Counterpoint: Should Religion Be Removed From Public Christmas Celebrations?

Secularists Fight Back In The War On Christmas

Published: Monday, November 23, 2009

Updated: Monday, November 23, 2009

In the opening salvo of the re-introduced war on Christmas campaign, it’s important to note an old cliché. In war, truth is often the first casualty. So it goes with the untimely re-emergence of the forces of God seeking to emblazon the spirit of Christmas onto the rest of us, like the lepers we are.

Let the pagan origins of Christmas become but a footnote to this story, lest one truly understand the context of a giant pine tree in one’s living room. Consider the convergence of two factors: the religious tradition of Christmas and hyper-consumerism; or in an apt metaphor, Black Friday. These two things are annually rammed together like the little drummer boy and a Mac truck. And now, enter the forces of good.

Just recently – well, before Thanksgiving – the American Family Association (AFA) in Mississippi decided to unleash its Christmas protectionist messages – a familiar theme with them – against the blasphemers at retailing giant Gap Inc. According to the AFA’s Web site, the goal was to call for a “two-month boycott over the company’s failure to use the word ‘Christmas’ in its advertising to Christmas shoppers.”

To them, “Happy Holidays,” a seemingly innocuous phrase on its face, can be summed up as a big “bah humbug.”

Such actions are becoming their own Christmas tradition. Somewhere lost in the outrage over semantics are common messages that can be gleaned from traditions and doctrines, just as fundamentally important to their followers as Christian ones. Among these attributes of “good will” and “peace to man” includes humility, open-mindedness, and tolerance.

As purely a holiday tradition, such themes have already largely been embraced by others, including many secularists who celebrate the notion of the season as one that is fundamentally and democratically inclusive of others. Believing that such principles cannot or do not coincide with the rest of a society during a holiday season is both arrogant and presumptuous.

Beneath the upcoming furor – most certainly being constructed via the pulpit and elsewhere – is a more fundamental debate. Freedom of religion is a wonderful, blessed thing to the Christian, and vital to understanding it is the inherent privilege in the celebration of Christmas as a national holiday to begin and end with.

For no other religious group has such an entitlement or right, and rest assured if this were the case, the war on Christmas brigade would be pissing in its version of eggnog.

As it turns out, the American Family Association was dead wrong in its assessment. Contrary to its claims, Gap did incorporate Christmas, as well as a litany of other religious specific terminologies in its advertisements.

One thing is beyond certain: Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity – both fearless crusaders for protecting Christmas from the heathens, need little introduction to the invocation of mass hysteria. They will run with this “war” (a pretty mind-numbing and ill-constructed analogy given Iraq and Afghanistan) facts be damned. They usually do.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Khalid Haroon
Tue Jan 5 2010 15:23
I am a little late to this discussion....but here I go anyway: I think it is important to understand the crux of the matter. The question is not what Christmas is all about, what it should be and how it is to be celebrated in US. The question is "who" should decide these issues. Government?? The contemporary understanding of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion and that includes Christianity. At least, this is how understand it to be.
People should be able to celebrate Christmas anyway they want. Your reason for celebrating Christmas maybe different than mine and we should not dictate to each other what we should or should not do during Christmas season. And government especially should stay out of it because it is unconstitutional.

Having said that, I understand why some people get upset when they see "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas". I take it that they feel that their traditions as they remember it, is getting altered and diluted. This is a change that they don't like and want to preserve the old tradition which is very important to them. These people have the right to boycott companies that use "Happy Holiday" signs, they should be able to use whatever symbol they want to be displayed on their private property or even public property as long as that property is open to all viewpoints. However, they should not expect the government to intervene and promote what they think is the right way to celebrate Christmas.
Let's just uphold the constitution and encourage government to stay out of this religious business and let every citizen of this country decide how he/she wants to celebrate this season.

I don't think we can take religion out of public but we can take the government out of religion.

Khalid Haroon
Tue Jan 5 2010 13:52
I am a little late to this discussion....but here I go anyway: I think it is important to understand the crux of the matter. The question is not what Christmas is all about, what it should be and how it is to be celebrated in US. The question is "who" should decide these issues. Government?? The contemporary understanding of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion and that includes Christianity. At least, this is how understand it to be.
People should be able to celebrate Christmas anyway they want. Your reason for celebrating Christmas maybe different than mine and we should not dictate to each other what we should or should not do during Christmas season. And government especially should stay out of it because it is unconstitutional.

Having said that, I understand why some people get upset when they see "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas". I take it that they feel that their traditions as they remember it, is getting altered and diluted. This is a change that they don't like and want to preserve the old tradition which is very important to them. These people have the right to boycott companies that use "Happy Holiday" signs, they should be able to use whatever symbol they want to be displayed on their private property or even public property as long as that property is open to all viewpoints. However, they should not expect the government to intervene and promote what they think is the right way to celebrate Christmas.
Let's just uphold the constitution and encourage government to stay out of this religious business and let every citizen of this country decide how he/she wants to celebrate this season.

I don't think we can take religion out of public but we can take the government out of religion.

Justin Vicory
Wed Nov 25 2009 18:13
don Keith,

Thanks for the Mack attack. You're right.

Justin Vicory
Wed Nov 25 2009 18:10
Michael,

The following is from christian answers.net and allabout jesuschrist.org. These are Christian websites:

"Was Jesus born on December 25? There is no evidence for this date. So then, who decided that Jesus' birth would be celebrated on that date? The early Christian church did not celebrate Jesus' birth. It wasn't until A.D. 440 that the church officially proclaimed December 25 as the birth of Christ. This was not based on any religious evidence but on a pagan feast. Saturnalia was a tradition inherited by the Roman pagans from an earlier Babylonian priesthood. December 25 was used as a celebration of the birthday of the sun god. It was observed near the winter solstice.

The apostles in the Bible predicted that some Christians would adopt pagan beliefs to enable them to make their religion more palatable to the pagans around them. Therefore, some scholars think the church chose the date of this pagan celebration to interest them in Christianity. The pagans were already used to celebrating on this date.

The Bible itself tells us that December 25 is an unlikely date for His birth. Palestine is very cold in December. It was much too cold to ask everyone to travel to the city of their fathers to register for taxes. Also the shepherds were in the fields (Luke 2:8-12). Shepherds were not in the fields in the winter time. They are in the fields early in March until early October. This would place Jesus' birth in the spring or early fall. It is also known that Jesus lived for 33.5 years and died at the feast of the Passover, which is at Easter time. He must therefore have been born six months the other side of Easter - making the date around the September/October time frames.

Michael Winters
Wed Nov 25 2009 12:20
Hmm...the "pagan origins of Christmas"? Certainly, you must learn to check your "facts" more thoroughly. It is indeed correct to say that Christmas has been paganized throughout its existence. But, as the event, whether you're a believer or non-, irrefutably commemorates the birth of Jesus of Nazareth, it would be unwise to paint it as anything but that. Oh wait. Perhaps you still wonder: "Does that still make this a celebration originated by pagans?" Absolutely not. Individuals who feel Christmas needs to be defended feel as they do so people like you won't continue to misconstrue its true meaning. Quite simply, with phrases like "Freedom of religion is a wonderful, blessed thing to the Christian...", it's quite evident that you're no more than a bottom-feeding bigot. Your--ironically--holier than thou attitude seems to afford you the ignorance of not realizing that toleration and even acceptance is not a one-way street.
don Keith
Wed Nov 25 2009 06:43
A fine, upstanding fact checker such as yourself would know the truck manufacturer is named 'Mack'

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In