College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Counterpoint: “Heads” vs. “Feds”: The Debate Over Marijuana Legalization

“Feds”

Published: Monday, March 1, 2010

Updated: Monday, March 1, 2010

stutman

Stutman

Robert Stutman is a 25-year veteran of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), during which time he rose to become director of the DEA’s New York City office. After retiring in 1990, he formed the Stutman Group, an organization which is committed to drug education in schools, communities, and businesses.

The issue of legalization/decriminalization of cannabis is so interesting because it encompasses so many other issues: states’ rights vs. federal rights, doctor/patient relationship, democracy vs. republic, etc.

No matter which side of the issue a student is on, my guess is that the issue itself is far more complex than they first thought.

I understand that the vast majority of college students are in favor of legalization of marijuana – that is nothing new. For the past three decades, the vast majority of college students have been in favor of legalization of marijuana, and 15 years later the vast majority of those same students have been against legalization.

My job at the debate will be to make sure that Steve Hager, and all of the students who will challenge me, do so by using facts, not wishful thinking. The basic concept of the American debate on any issue is we, as Americans, have the right to our own opinion.

But we absolutely do not have the right to make up the facts. Facts are facts, whether we like them or not, and I will attempt to make sure we all adhere to facts.

I will argue that marijuana should not be legalized for the simple reason that we will have far more users. This problem added to the problem of binge drinking in the U.S., most people believe, is an unacceptable trade-off to allow a group to use their recreational drug of choice.

This is not really an argument about medicine, counter culture, etc. It is about recreational drug use and whether America needs more of it.

The fact that we will have more marijuana use if it is legalized is fairly easily proven.

First on the practical side: Does campus binge drinking go down as cannabis use goes up? Of course not, they both grow.

More importantly, every study shows that it is easier in the U.S. for high school students to buy marijuana than beer. Yet 10 times more high school students drink beer than smoke marijuana. Why? Because of the societal acceptance of beer that does not yet exist for marijuana.

We have legitimate ways to change policy in the U.S. We vote, we attack laws in the courts, we depend on science, etc. If any of those methods suggest we should legalize marijuana, then I believe we should. But not before then.

Finally, Steve Hager and I will disagree about this issue very vehemently. However, we will do so in a very respectful way because despite the fact that we look and are different, Steve and I are and have been good friends for 10 years. You can disagree without being personal.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

2 comments Log in to Comment

Santos Halper
Tue Mar 2 2010 17:36
This is a poorly written article that lacks any substantive points. A few refutations:

1) It is inaccurate to say that the "vast majority" of the non-college population is against legalization. The latest major polls are showing support at 44% nationwide for full (recreational) legalization. Support for legalization of medical marijuana is at a staggering 81%. This is not a fringe opinion, it's a mainstream stance. So your claims that "most people believe" that marijuana legalization is a bad idea are questionable at best.

2) What proof do you have that "we will have far more users"? That is unsupported by any evidence. If that is true, why are usage rates for marijuana use far lower in the Netherlands than in the US? You said yourself this is "easily proven." Please supply this supposed proof.

3) Your "practical" question about the correlation between binge drinking and marijuana use is answered in a completely unscientific, anecdotal manner. What statistically significant evidence do you have that allows you to assert that "of course" there is not a correlation between increased marijuana use and decreased binge drinking?

You said several times that what's needed here is a sober, factual investigation. I agree. Please comply with that by avoiding anecdotes, ad hoc assertions, and statements based on feeling instead of direct evidence.

Johnny Green
Mon Mar 1 2010 15:14
I hope this event gets a lot of publicity, and that the transcript is published. I would love to hear the arguments that the former DEA has to say in defense of prohibition, as well as see how articulate the rep from High Times is. I would rather have Marc Emery, or ASA argue on behalf of marijuana, but maybe Mr. Hager is a great debator. I'm looking forward to seeing what happens! Want to know what the marijuana laws are in your state? Go to www.theweedblog.com. There is a lot of interesting stuff on this site.

Johnny Green
www.theweedblog.com

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In